Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 05:06

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What's the most sordid activity you've ever seen or heard about at a bachelorette party?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
The Tyrese Haliburton Conundrum - The Ringer
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Dark matter 'lampshades' dimming stars could solve one of the greatest scientific mysteries - Space
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Jim Cramer says these hot new stocks are ones to watch - TheStreet
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Stock futures fall as investors eye Israel-Iran conflict: Live updates - CNBC
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.